点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
南京GDP五年跨越五个千亿级台阶 挺进全国大中城市十强******
中新网南京1月10日电 (记者 杨颜慈)1月10日上午，南京市第十七届人民代表大会第一次会议在南京人民大会堂开幕。记者从会上获悉，2022年，在多种因素承压下，南京经济交出亮眼成绩单：全市地区生产总值五年跨越五个千亿级台阶，改革开放以来首次迈进全国大中城市十强。
南京市代市长陈之常代表南京市人民政府在大会作《政府工作报告》。陈之常表示，过去五年，南京坚持稳中求进工作总基调，高水平全面建成小康社会，圆满完成“十三五”规划，制定实施“十四五”规划，“强富美高”新南京现代化建设迈出坚实步伐。
夜经济火热，打造南京消费不夜城。图为流光溢彩的夜秦淮。 泱波 摄五年来，南京“经济强”的实力更加彰显。GDP稳中有进，跨越五个千亿级台阶。对外开放再创佳绩，外贸进出口总量由611.9亿美元增长到920亿美元左右，累计使用外资223.3亿美元。
与此同时，创新成为南京闪亮的“城市名片”。报告显示，南京市高新技术企业从1844家增加到8800家以上。通过聚焦创新型产业体系打造，南京形成1个五千亿级和4个千亿级新兴产业集群。规上工业企业超4000家，培育国家制造业单项冠军企业16家。
在经济提质增效之际，民生不断改善，市民的“钱袋子”更鼓了。统计显示，南京民生投入年均增长5.9%，占一般公共预算支出比重保持在75%以上。居民人均可支配收入达6.9万元、年均增长7.3%，居民收入增长持续快于经济增速。
陈之常表示，刚刚过去的2022年，是新时代新征程中具有特殊重要意义的一年。南京承压前行、苦干实干，顶住了冲击、稳住了大局，全市经济社会发展总体实现稳中有进。
南京坚持“山水城林”融为一体的生态格局，经济发展同时让好山好水融入城市风光。 泱波 摄过去一年，南京全力保增长、稳大盘，经济运行实现企稳向好；聚力抓创新、强产业，转型发展动能更加强劲；大力推改革、促开放，机制活力持续优化提升；致力补短板、惠民生，群众生活水平稳步提高；强力守底线、防风险，社会大局保持和谐稳定。
统计显示，2022年南京预计全年地区生产总值增长2%左右，一般公共预算收入同口径正增长，社会消费品零售总额与上年基本持平。
南京经济在承压下提质增效。图为繁忙的港口码头。 泱波 摄值得关注的是，消费在南京经济发展中起到显著拉动作用。通过多方联动促消费回补，举办南京国际消费节，推出1000余场线上线下融合促消费活动，南京打造1000个消费新场景，新增商业品牌首店近300家，新街口商圈入选全国首批示范智慧商圈，熙南里街区入选第二批国家级夜间文旅消费集聚区，消费拉动作用稳步增强。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)